Table 2: Assessment of Measurement Model on Loading, CR and AVEStructural Model and Hypotheses TestingAfter validation of the measurement model, path analysis was performed to test the proposed hypotheses in this study� In line with the suggestion by Hair Jr et al� (2017), this study reported the inner VIF values, the path-coefficient results, coefficient of determination (R2), effect sizes (f2), predictive relevance of both Q2 and PLS predict� Subsequently, the bootstrapping method with a resampling of 5000 was used to estimate the significance of the path coefficient (Streukens and Leroi-Werelds 2016)� Table 6 results showed that TD has a significant relationship with OP (β = 0�095, t = 1�272, p > 0�05, f 2 = 0�011), which support H1� CD was found to have a significant positive relationship with OP (β = 0�462, t = 8�569, p < 0�01, f 2 = 0�253) and TE was found to have a significant positive relationship with OP (β = 0�331, t = 4�502, p < 0�01, f 2 = 0�123)�ItemsLoading0�75CG1 0�744CG20�802CG30�863CG40�84CG50�807EB10�833EB100�766EB110�797EB20�547EB30�737EB40�822EB50�753EB60�537EB70�759EB80�731EB90�595OP10�872OP20�89OP30�86OP40�785OP50�854TD10�846TD20�508TD30�806TD40�752TD50�784TD60�716TE20�858TE30�841TE4TE50�839Note: Item TE1 was deleted due to low loading�CA0�860�9160�8610�8540�834CR0�8640�9280�8780�8720�858AVE0�5520�5060�5720�5130�56115
元のページ ../index.html#115