alignment with fundamental values, an ethics code, and the ASN code of conduct (Dwiputrianti et al., 2019). In Indonesia, the implementation of the merit system is regulated by the State Civil Apparatus Commission (Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara/KASN), a non-structural agency. KASN has developed an instrument to assess and map the implementation of the merit system within government agencies, focusing on the following eight aspects: The method employed in assessing the merit system is self-assessment conducted through the Merit System Implementation Self-Assessment Information System. This instrument is objective and standardized as per State Civil Apparatus Commission Regulation No. 9 of 2019, outlining the procedures for self-assessment of merit system implementation in ASN management within government agencies. The evaluation results yield information regarding the level of merit system implementation in each government agency and provide recommendations for improving ASN management in alignment with merit principles. In 2019, KASN conducted a mapping of the results from self-assessments of merit system implementation in local governments (Dwiputrianti, 2019). The findings revealed that approximately 83.5% of all district and city governments that underwent merit system assessments received ratings in the ‘poor’ and ‘inadequate’ categories. Factors contributing to the low implementation of the merit system include:1) The ASN (State Civil Apparatus) has a limited understanding of how to apply the merit system to ASN policy and 66Figure 1. Aspects of Implementing the Merit System in the Management of the State Civil Apparatus (State Civil Apparatus Commission, 2019)
元のページ ../index.html#66